2016 Mazda CX-9 vs 2016 Toyota Highlander near Sacramento, CA
Which SUV is Right for You?
It can be tough to compare vehicles when you’re in the market for a new SUV. Each manufacturer makes a persuasive sales pitch to make their vehicle sound the best, but how can you tell which is actually the better option? At Mazda of Elk Grove, we look at the facts only, so you can clearly see the better buy between the 2016 Mazda CX-9 vs 2016 Toyota Highlander near Sacramento, CA.
When it comes to performance between these two vehicles, you want an SUV that perfectly blends power and efficiency. The Mazda CX-9 comes standard with a 2.5L turbocharged 4-cylinder SKYACTIV®-G1 engine on its base trim level. This brand-new powertrain pumps out 227 horsepower and 310 lb.-ft. of torque when you hit the gas, and its advanced design helps to eliminate turbo lag that plagues other models. By comparison, the Highlander offers a 2.7 4-cylinder engine on its base model that doesn’t give you the same power when you rev the engine. The Highlander’s powerhouse puts out just 185 horsepower and 184 lb.-ft. of torque. Not only does the Mazda CX-9 offer a more thrilling ride, but it also holds a significant advantage in fuel economy as well. Its SKYACTIV®-G1 powertrain provides a responsible 22/28 MPG city/hwy2. You’ll have to stop at the pump more frequently if you’re driving in the Highlander, as it is limited to 20/25 MPG city/hwy3 on its base trim level. Not only does the Mazda CX-9 best the Highlander in terms of fuel economy, it offers best-in-class4 MPG.
Everyone is looking for features that makes your drive easier on the road, and both the 2016 Mazda CX-9 vs 2016 Toyota Highlander near Sacramento, CA, have their fair share of these options. However, only the Mazda CX-9 offers more of what you want as standard accessories, compared to optional add-ons to the Highlander. To keep you cool in the summer and warm in the winter, the Mazda CX-9 offers standard three-zone automatic climate control, which allows both the driver, front passenger, and rear passengers to have individual temperature settings. If you opt for the 2016 Highlander, this feature isn’t even available on its base trim level. To have a perfectly cooled cabin by the time you slide into the interior, utilize the Mazda CX-9’s remote start system; once again, the Highlander falls short, as this feature isn’t available on the base model.
For comfort, the 2016 Mazda CX-9 offers plenty of space for your cargo and passengers alike. It provides 14.4 cubic ft. of space behind the third-row of seating, which is more than the 13.8 cubic ft. of room5 that you’ll have in the Highlander. Both of these vehicles have three rows of seating, but the Mazda CX-9 offers more legroom for second- and third-row passengers than the Highlander.
After comparing the 2016 Mazda CX-9 vs 2016 Toyota Highlander near Sacramento, CA, we have a clear winner: the Mazda CX-9! You can see this remarkable vehicle in person at Mazda of Elk Grove! Take it for a test drive today!
1. SKYACTIV is a registered trademark of Mazda Motor Corporation.
2. Based on EPA estimates for 2016 Mazda CX-9 FWD 22 city/28 highway/25 combined MPG. Signature model with standard AWD shown, 21 city/27 highway/23 combined MPG. Actual results will vary.
3. 2016 EPA-estimated city/highway mileage. Actual results may vary.
4. Based on comparison of 2016 model year non-hybrid, FWD/AWD, 3-row mid-size crossover SUVs. Source: Model Year 2016 Fuel Economy Guide dated February 24, 2016 (www.fueleconomy.gov).
5. Cargo and load capacity limited by weight and distribution.